Should all scenic spots charge an entry fee?

I don’t think all scenic spots should charge an entry fee. If a place is mainly a natural landscape, like a beach, a viewpoint, or an old public square, it feels a bit unfair to put a price tag on it, because local people should still be able to enjoy their own environment. That said, I understand why some popular sites need a fee. If the money is used for cleaning, security, restoration, and controlling overcrowding, then a reasonable charge can actually protect the place rather than exploit visitors. When we travel, scenic spots are definitely attractive, but I wouldn’t say they are always the best choice. Sometimes the most memorable parts of a trip are walking through local neighbourhoods, trying street food, or talking to residents. Landmarks are useful because they give us a quick sense of a city’s history and identity, but tourists shouldn’t feel they have failed if they skip one or two famous places. Travel should be more about meaningful experience than just ticking boxes. As for where people live, big cities appeal to many people because they offer better jobs, education, healthcare, and entertainment. The trade-off is that life can be crowded and expensive. In terms of housing, I think many people dream of living in a bungalow because it offers privacy, space, and a quieter lifestyle. However, in reality, tall buildings are more practical in cities because they save land and usually provide easier access to transport and services.